Moto g4 geekbench android#
Moto g4 geekbench software#
Moto g4 geekbench plus#

While the device certainly looks a little more professional, itвЂ™s also a bit boring. The Moto G 2015, for example, felt more at home in the hand thanks to the curved back. Previous Moto G smartphones featured a slightly curved back that offered better ergonomics. WhereвЂ™s the ergonomic design? Moto Actions? The G4 Play is a weak budget phone in a tough market filled with $200-$300 phones that offer far superior performance and power. If youвЂ™re a heavy user looking for a budget-priced phone, go for the Moto G4 PlusВ as it offers more processing power.

The 2015 Moto G with 2GB RAM suffered sluggish performance and app freezes when multi-tasking after several months of use. Regardless, do not expect flawless performance - especially when youвЂ™re swapping through multiple apps. ItвЂ™s unclear whatвЂ™s causing the stutters then, but theyвЂ™re not frequent and have not impacted our day-to-day usage with the G4 Play so far. Apps and the camera open quickly, and we havenвЂ™t had much trouble playing somewhat graphically intensive games like Badland 2, Asphalt 8: Airborne, and Dead Trigger 2. This stutter is mainly present when you wake the device after some periods of inactivity, but for the most part we have yet to encounter any real performance issues. These numbers paint a pretty bleak picture, but benchmarks are one thing - howвЂ™s real world performance? Upon immediately setting up the phone, we were greeted to random stutters and lag while moving between Google Now and the home screen, and when scrolling through apps and widgets. ThatвЂ™s almost half of what MeizuвЂ™s M3 NoteВ received, and that phone happens to cost the same price. ThatвЂ™s worse on both accounts compared to the 2015 version, which received 512 and 1,283 respectively.ДЄnd when comparing with AnTuTu Benchmark, the G4 Play earned a score of 28,393. Using GeekBenchвЂ™s app, the Moto G4 Play received a single-core score of 503 and a multi-core score of 1,267.

Moto g4 geekbench plus#

In comparison, the Moto G4 Plus got a score of 384. ItвЂ™s very rare for old hardware to outperform the new, but that is the case here.ДЈDMark Sling Shot using ES 3.0 gave the device a score of 53 - thatвЂ™s one point less than the Moto G 2015. We ran a few benchmark tests and the device actually performed the same, if not worse, than the 2015 Moto G. Performance is a little tricky on the G4 Play. ItвЂ™s nice that Lenovo has one Moto G4 thatвЂ™s not 5.5-inches for people who prefer smaller phones, Still, it has more in common with it than its bigger brothers. The G4 Play is the runt of the litter and is $30 cheaper than the 1GB RAM variant of the Moto G 2015. The Moto G4 and the Plus are slightly more expensive than their predecessor, and they offer better specs than the Play. It mimics the lineup of MotorolaвЂ™s flagship Moto Z line. This year marks the first when the Moto G line was split into three smartphonesВ - the Moto G4, Moto G4 Plus, and the Moto G4 Play. The Moto G line kicked off in 2013 and brought new meaning to the term вЂњbudget phone.вЂќ It continued to deliver solid performance and design for a low price in 20. The new Moto G4 Play leaves us with a phone that offers no compelling features, just a low price tag. Lenovo has removed the features that make Moto phones unique, from the inside out. But when comparing the G4 Play to its predecessor, the 2016 variant feels like an afterthought - a step back after what the Moto G 2015 offered for a budget device.

Moto g4 geekbench android#

That hardly means weвЂ™re complaining about having stock Android on a device thatвЂ™s not a part of GoogleвЂ™s Nexus lineup.

Moto g4 geekbench software#

Not the same.вЂќ Under Lenovo, Motorola may have lost the memo because thereвЂ™s not much distinguishing the Moto G4 Play from a Nexus, at least on the software side. GoogleвЂ™s Android motto for the past year or so has been вЂњBe together.